The Last Inspector's Blog - Fighting FAA & Boeing Fraud from the 737 to the 787
Persecution or Prosecution?  
Sunday, June 3, 2007, 08:03 PM
I haven't covered much about my own personal situation for trying in vain to protect the public. My failure, of course, is not for lack of trying. Both Boeing and the FAA blocked my attempts at ending their symbiotic corruption.

Anyway, I'm still unemployed after over a year being kicked out on the streets by Boeing because I was attempting to bring them to justice. I have applied at many jobs, however I appear to be blacklisted from my occupation. Surprising? No. Not much surprises me anymore, especially when it come to what Boeing and its government agencies do.

I am not very legally savvy, but it has been a year and a couple weeks since I was arrested at the dishonest request of Boeing. With a three year statute of limitations on any supposed crimes I committed in trying to protect public safety, I guess I have a little less than two years until the cloud Boeing has placed over me as retaliation is lifted as far as potential criminal charges go.

Frankly, I don't expect I will ever be charged with any crime as a result of my arguably false arrest at Boeing's request. Over a year has passed, and even though technically almost two years remain in which I can be charged, there are several reasons to doubt any charges will ultimately be filed as Boeing retaliatorily wishes.

First, any case against me would not be a complex case requiring as much time as has elapsed since my arrest. The prosecutor's office themselves thought so, only sealing the records stating the reasoning for my arrest and my possesions being searched for six months, which they stated would be more than adequate. Even though they extended the seal by submitting, questionably, the same arguments to the judge (which had to have changed over the six months) for doing so that were originally presented after the six months expired, I don't think that indicates their steadfast adherence to Boeing's wishes that the book be thrown at me for daring to expose the crimes of Boeing's elite.

To charge me after all of this time, although possible, would show that the prosecutor's office is beholden to this pressure from Boeing, and is looking much harder than they thought they would be looking for a reason to charge me in order to please Boeing management. Of course, all of this time may have elapsed because they want to ensure they legally "burn me at the stake" per Boeing's request by charging me with as many charges as they possibly can for my whistleblowing and attempted public lifesaving activities, thereby pleasing Boeing as much as they possibly can, but I don't think the public would want that, and ultimately the wheels of justice turn to protect the public as I was doing, and do not turn to protect corruption at corporations, no matter what their size.

That's enough about this line of thought for today.

This item should be very interesting, however, to you:

Showing that Boeing did in fact want to persecute me by prosecuting me, I learned that Boeing had caught someone doing the same thing that I was allegedly doing--leaking stories to the press. This person had been leaking information about Boeing's competiton sensitive and highly secret plans for their moving production lines in Renton to the press.

What did Boeing do to this "leaker," as they essentially did the sae thing as I allegedly did, except without any possible motive of protecting public lives? Boeing gave them five days off without pay! Nope. No arrest. No termination. Just a leisurely five day unpaid vacation and they were back at work.

What did I get for the same alledged offense when Boeing knew I was trying to protect public and military lives by doing what I did? They had me falsely arrested by never telling the police about my whistleblower status. They indefinately suspended me, then the V.P. of BCA's H.R. department approved my termination. They have been attempting to have me charged for a crime since, with some difficulty for obvious reasons.

So, I think you'll agree with me that I've just proved Boeing's actions against me were intentionally unjust, and just retaliation for my daring to expose the real crimes of their management that I later reported to them, and who they promptly promoted and are still protecting with the full resources of the Boeing Company. It is my opinion they did so so the noted management would not tell what they knew about Boeing's conduct to authorities, and instead would side against me, and truth.




add comment ( 7 views )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 2.8 / 96 )

<< <Back | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | Next> >>