The Last Inspector's Blog - Fighting FAA & Boeing Fraud from the 737 to the 787
More Fallout from Boeing's Whistleblower Retaliation Against Me  
Thursday, August 21, 2008, 10:34 PM
Posted by Administrator
I apologize to all of you out there who have hoped that I could put the brakes on at least some of the fraud at Boeing that I have documented on this blog, my website, and in other correspondence and you may have witnessed yourself, but dealing with another disaster related to Boeing's not so subtle efforts to destroy my life for trying to bring some light to the dark corners of their closet of skeletons has taken up all of my time of late.

I have been going through a divorce, and there are many of you who know more than I what that entails. I certainly could use any advice any of you may have, especially for a man involved in a divorce in a system seemingly stacked against our gender, even if only older children are involved who want to live with their dad full time.

Many whistleblowers, I'm told, end up in divorces after some megalith corporation they have blown the whistle on, like I did against Boeing, has attempted to ruin their lives like Boeing has largely succeeded in ruining mine.

My case is not new in this regard. Such stresses that Boeing and a corrupt (Republican) King County Prosecutor's Office has imposed on my life in an effort to destroy me so I am no longer a threat (in Boeing's case) to the continuance of their corruption expose the strengths or weaknesses of a marraige. (As a side note, it is too bad in this day of a two party system that being Republican equates to being corrupt, and for protecting the corruption of powerful benefactors like Boeing, in the King Conuty Prosecutor's case.)

Although I have met several couples over the years in similar whistleblower situations as mine, I have never met one such couple in which their marraige was not strengthened through the trials imposed by the corrupt entity they were dealing with, although I know that that is not the norm for some, like in my case.

It would seem logical that a wife or husband would come to the aid of their spouse and support them like never before when they are under attack by an obviously corrupt private or government entity, as I was. Especially so when marraige vows infer such care for each other--that marraige is not only for the good times, but to help each other weather the storms of life as well.

I did take my vows seriously in that and all other regards. My wife did not.

This is not the place for too many details, but when times got tough, my wife got planning to go, and then left.

First she left me with the kids, which I was more than happy to continue to support and protect. When she realized that leaving without the kids (who hated her for doing so and for other actions she took against them before she left) was not to her advantage in a divorce, she came back to the house under the guise of supporting the children morally during my trial by Boeing (and their prosecutor) and working on our relationship.

However, she never returned my efforts to save our marraige, and when she was able to convince one of my daughters to leave with her, she took them both and left again at the earliest opportunity. My younger daughter decided to come back soon thereafter and live with me full time by her own choice. I will always be grateful to my younger daughter for having the maturity to see though her mother's manipulation and see her true character, then decide to stay with me instead of her mother.

Yesterday was our twentieth wedding anniversary. Most of that time was relatively happy as most marraiges go. Only the last few years of Boeing retaliation has been tough. My wife, however, is not one to forgive and forget. Quite the opposite. Of course a marraige in which a spouse only seems to remember the challenges in a marraige and none of the much more numerous good times is going to be difficult. I think this habit of hers is largely from the unhealthy example of her own parent's marraige, in which her father waited hand and foot on his wife as if she was a queen and not an equal in the marraige. A normally even tempered man, he went into uncontrollable anger if my wife or her brother even suggested their mother was anything but the queen of the house. Love was also not expressed in the house for the children. I can't imagine how that negatively affected my wife or her brother. Contrastingly, her decade younger sister was spoiled and treated like a child should be.

Although neither my wife or I had perfect examples in our parent's marraiges, I at least acknowledged that. I think my wife wanted to emulate the aberrant relationship between her father and mother. I wanted an equal partnership in our marraige, instead, and for us not to try to emulate such bad examples in our relationship. I make no claim to being the perfect husband. No husband is. But I always treated my wife with love and respect, even when she would not treat me that way. Her attempts to emulate some abnormal pre-set vision in her mind of what was the perfect marraige, perfect household, and expectations of a perfect husband resulted in her inevitable disappointment and considerable emotional abuse (and a few occasions of what I considered physical abuse) of the children as well as discord with me when I attempted to protect the children from such abuse and refused for the most part to let her emotionally abuse me except when it took her abusive attention off of the kids. The stress of Boeing's imposed termination and trial of me was a main factor in her actions. If someone in some agency or political office had stopped Boeing's fraud before I had to resort to finding undeniable proof of Boeing's and the FAA's working together fraud to get their attention, I would never have been placed in the position that allowed Boeing to arrogantly retaliate against me as they did. I think I could have been successful in strengthening our marraige and avoiding divorce if the right people had just stepped up and did their jobs. That was not what they chose to do, however. Corrupt and arrogant corporations like Boeing who have grown far too big (and therefore should be broken up ASAP) and powerful overcame their obligation to do the right thing and do their jobs.

However, in getting back to the divorce itself, I once again learned how biased the courts and those who pretend to be unbiased arbiters behind the court's benches really are when I went to my first real hearing on my divorce, where the woman commissioner who I later learned almost never rules for men before her gave my wife everything she asked for.

This was despite my wife abandoning her own children the first time she left with me taking care of them for most of the past year, and despite her lawyer not filing his lie filled paperwork correctly with the court before the hearing. We asked that they not consider their filings as they were not properly submitted so we had had no chance to respond to them, however the biased commissioner overlooked such major errors in deference to the woman before her as I heard later was her bias.

Too bad there is no mechanism for removing such biased judges so we can have the impartial arbiters of the law we are supposed to have, and not, as in this case, a woman comissioner with an axe to grind against men for some reason unrelated to any of the men, like me, asking for her unbiased and carefully considered decision in their hearing. Why she seems to hate men with a passion I do not know. Perhaps a long lost love crossed her, fostering a deep hate within her against all men, and a drive to get in a position, such as the comissioner she is in divorce court, where she can take revenge aginst that long lost love in the form of the men that come before her seeking the only thing that matters to them in their lives--the custody of their beloved children--I only know that this bias, whatever its cause, should disqualify her from her place as a family court commissioner.

So now I am essentially homeless, as the house went to the wife with primary custody of the children. Score one more for Boeing's agenda to ruin my life for daring to expose them for what they are and end just one facet of their ongoing "post GSA" corruption.

Surely some corrupt Boeing executives are dancing around somewhere in their overcompensated lives while reading this. So be it. But who really loses in this is my children, as well as those entrusting their lives to the compromised quality and safety of Boeing airplanes, who are also affected by these corrupt Boeing executives' larger corrupt acts.
add comment ( 1 view )   |  0 trackbacks   |  permalink   |   ( 2.7 / 278 )

<< <Back | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | Next> >>